Multiple Personality Disorder
Published on April 12, 2005 By azdruid In Windows XP
And so, the triumphant sequel to OS Wars. I recently (eh. two weeks ago) wrote an article, extolling the virtues of Linux. As an avid reader of Slashdot, NewsForge, OSnews and others, I am consistently bombarded by newsposts of the latest and greatest Linux achievements, as well as a steady stream of anti-Windows blogs. I'd like to take the opportunity to offer a response in defense of Windows (more specifically, Windows XP).

I have very little patience for newbies who write articles about an operating system without having truly mastered it. I often read poorly supported arguments for either Linux or Windows that consistently use a generic overused topic. For instance, many firmly entrenched Linux users are not willing to try using Windows because a) its not opensource it costs money c) corporations are evil. Windows users often knock Linux by saying a) its too hard to install stuff its free so it must suck c) lazy.

Anyway. Onto the subject of misconceptions regarding Windows XP. I recently read an article somewhere (cant remember where..sorry) that said that it was easier to convert newbies to a different OS than it was experienced users, because we know what we like and fear change. I agree with this, for the most part. So, why not use Linux exclusively?

- Even though I love apt and yum, theres still something nice about being able to download one file that walks you through installation and puts a shortcut in the launch menu (YES, I am aware that this is so because there is only one distribution platform.). On Linux, there is Autopackage, but its still in its infancy.
- When I search the Internet for software, I expect it to run on Windows. Its a conditioning that's sunk in because of Windows' prevalence. Windows just happens to be the platform that more people write for.
- Drivers. I am aware that Linux counterparts are continuously improving, but like I previously stated, its just a lot easier knowing there will be Windows drivers on the manufacturer's website than resorting to Google.
- Faster. This one definitely needs clarification. Myself, I happen to find Explorer considerably more responsive than both Konqueror and Nautilus. Plus, Windows boots faster (cold to desktop).
- This sort of goes along with the installer point, but I happen to appreciate only having to bother ensuring that program X is compatible with Win32. The downside here is that there is one way to do a lot of things; choice is sacrificed. In some cases, I would rather take a sold, universal foundation over choice, especially if I don't find any outstanding problems with the given solution.

I use a heavily modified version of Windows that is highly superior to the vanilla dumbass edition. It also clears up a lot of problems that most people complain about.

-- ITS SLOW. Hell yes! XP is horribly slow. The trick is to make it go faster. How does one do this? if you have your original XP disc, you have the option of using nLite (Link), which allows you to remove components from XP you won't use like extra services, and other components. It also lets you slipstream SPs and internally tweak stuff. Of all the programs I have ever used in my life, nLite ranks very high on that list. I won't go into more detail about its usage, since I am sure you can figure it out.

Also, TURN OFF extra services! This is the single most set of components about XP that people overlook. In most cases, over half of the currently running services can safely be disabled, decreasing memory usage. Microsoft seemed to think that Joe Dumbass was very interested in running a VPN, operating a web server, and managing remote terminals. Sound familiar? I am going to speculate that no, they do not. Sometime I will post a more indepth guide on removing services. If you want to try it yourself, go to Start > Run > type services.msc

Here are some other things I do to make Windows run better:

- Roll my install out with nLite. I probably already mentioned that. Did I also mention that it is a wonderful, wonderful piece of software?
- Never install bloatware. (ie Java, .NET fx.........)
- Run Windowblinds. I love eyecandy)
- Use a hardware firewall, which eliminates the need for a software one.
- Be intelligent. No you dont need antivirus software either.
- Use Firefox and Thunderbird. There is NO excuse for not doing this.
- If you share my passion for continuous music, do NOT use Windows Media Player or another bloated jukebox. Use Winamp or Musikcube

You know, I sincerely want to go on, but lack of structure in this piece would only confuse us both. I hope this information can help you.

Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Apr 13, 2005
xino, Blackviper seems to be down for now but there's another source for Service info at Link
It's not as good as the BlackViper site only because they don't tell you what to run and not to run. They do however let you know what the service does.
on Apr 13, 2005
I'm NOT a gamer. Far from it. I have one game installed - Final Fantasy 8. I see no reason to waste money on RAM when to difference between 512 and 1 gig is hardy noticeable. Keep in mind I run a AMD powered system so I'm already on the edge of performance compared to a Pentium setup. More is NOT always better but rather sometimes a waste of money...


LoL, Kona, Kona, Kona...again with the AMD BS..is there a day that goes by that you do not have that issue on your mind? ::sighs:: AMD's cost less and there is a very good reason for that, it is because they are 2cnd rate Kona.

Pentiums are the premium chip to have as far as a total computing enviroment.. Both chips have their strong and weak points and that is where your decision upon them should lay..Being that you are not a gamer then I would say your using a chip that is contradictory to your computing habits, since AMD's strong suit is infact *Gaming* but I am sure that the chip is fine with your usage since you probably wont ever really put it to the test performing the things that Pentiums are known to excel at.

Before you go off half cocked, and full of anger because I have a very different opinion than you do let me just say (again) that I have nothing against AMD and I am not "Bashing" it in any way, as you seem to love to do with Pentiums.

This argument is dead Kona, it has been litterally beaten to death, nobody wants to argue about it anymore, well except for you that is..
Give it a rest dude, and if you feel that insecure about owning an AMD then go and get a Pentium, no one is going to blame you..do whatever it takes but quit preaching to us about how superior AMD's are..it just is not so, the chips are basically "even-steven" deal with it..

Now back to our normally scheduled thread,
I believe it was *Windows* not *Processors*
Zero.
on Apr 13, 2005
I'm what they call a anti-mozilla nutcase


Kona, that's about the worst kept secret in the world.

As far as Windows tweaks, I've found some of the best here: http://www.pcstats.com/#news
on Apr 13, 2005
Zero I guess I shuld have reworded my respone. I was mearly trying to point out that in my speed range my AMD outdid it's P4 couterpart. No big deal I guess. I not angry with you at all.

One of these days I will need to upgrade this machine and I have been thinking about trying a Pentium setup.
on Apr 13, 2005
I too am anxious for Longhorn and was very disapointed when MS said they'd cut out so much.



As far as I am aware azdruid the only thing that was "cut" was the WinFS and that was so Longhorn could meet its May 2006 Launch Date - my understanding is that WinFS will be released after Longhorn is though there is no set launch date for it.

I think it is still worth looking forward to with the Avalon and Indigo technologies being revealed: not to mention the fact I won't have to upgrade right away since Avalon and Indigo are going to be released as "add-ons" to WinXP SP2 users. I can get a nice interface using Windowblinds so I can wait to get the full Longhorn and Aero envrionment it's all about the technology anyways, right?

Raymond
on Apr 13, 2005
You alldo know that gmail scans your emails and pops up targeted advertising according to what it scans right?


yep...that is why I do not use it either...I do not need someone telling me what I should or shouldn't buy based on my email. Hmmmm...sounds like "legal" spam to me

Raymond
on Apr 13, 2005
WOWfactor: Link. At the bottom of the page, there is a download called Alternative Runtimes. This is what you want. I hate .NET as much as you.

Regarding Gmail....you do know they offer POP service right? Straight to Thunderbird. No ads.

devTek: Yeah, but you just know they cut other stuff out and aren't telling us. Granted, MS has had a lot on their hands with SP2 and Windows Server 2003, but for a product that was expected years earlier, laziness is not an excuse. Have you read Paul Thurrot's guide to Longhorn? It is definitely one of the best. Link
on Apr 13, 2005
azdruid - it's still the point that gmail still scans your mail even when you use POP access. I like my privacy thank you.
on Apr 13, 2005
azdruid - yes I am familiar with Thurrott - that is where I get my info. And there is no indication that they have cut anything else, so no I don;t know that they have... why are you being so quick to bash something you haven't even used yet...?

Raymond
on Apr 14, 2005
I'm a pessimist
on Apr 14, 2005
Jafo can max out a gig ..... probably could max out 2 ... if/when I had them....
on Apr 19, 2005
AMD chips are by no means "second rate", I'd actually say they're currently the [x86 CPU] industry leaders, looking at their success with 64 bit CPUs as compared with Intel's lack thereof.
on Apr 20, 2005
WinXP SP2 because of that success.)


Pppfffft!! OMG! You call that SUCCESS???

BTW, you said in the first part of your article
its too hard to install stuff


Now, yes. Linux is lazy. You dont need to go on the net and search for stuff. I.E: yum install gimp No surfing websites nothing. Yum just finds it for you, to get you that proggy faster. That's lazy.

Also Linux features a huge amount of visual styles, compared to XP's 3.
on Apr 20, 2005
That's why we have WindowBlinds, Meowy.
on Apr 20, 2005
Yarlen: I know. My point is, that you don't need any additional software to have a good selection.
3 Pages1 2 3